Skip to content

Blog

TI apologizes

Wow, I just read, that TI has somehow apologized to Moni. She writes that “[t]he content of the letter made satisfactory statements regarding issues that were decisive to me, and I am glad that the controversy is over now.” Apparently, higher-ups in the organization do pay some attention to the graffiti on the “Toilet Stalls of the Internet” (a derogatory term for blogs in Germany which, much like the whole pyjama affair, became a badge of pride to the blogging “proletariat”).

Unfortunately, Moni’s story was just an example of the cease-and-desist avalanche hitting Germany. Already it continues. With each (pur)suit, freedom of expression is expelled bit by bit from the Internet.

Vaudeville and Ethics

Anyway, here is his message he sent her on Friday, 3/24/2006, as quoted in the “Unexpected Email from legal advisor, got until Sunday to decide” post by Moni:


Dear Mrs. xxx,

At the address http://wasweissich.twoday.net/stories/1407348/ within the European web hosting service twoday.net operated by Knallgrau New Media Solutions GmbH, you placed a text into the web that substantially violates the personality rights of the organization represented by me. This text is evidently based on information from our former employee Mrs. xxx, who has to be accused of considerable infringements as well.

Essentially, the allegations brought forth by you do not correspond to the facts. In the case of evaluations on your part, you are liable of unlawful slander.

I will spare myself the explication of details for now, and instead give you the opportunity to remove the text from the web immediately, no later than 3/26/2006, 12:00 am.

Should this not occur, I am already notifying you of a cease-and-desist letter and, if necessary, a cease-and-desist order. I am assuming that you are aware of the resulting legal and also financial consequences to you.

Sincerely,


Mkay… I’m gonna go take a shower now. I feel all… hairy.

Transparency Germany Press Release

Anyway, notice how they corroborate Moni’s story but still call her a liar? Yep, that’s some quality German PR…

Here is the translation of the press release by Transparency Germany, that was apparently pulled just hours later. (Can they do that?) I found a copy of it here. Alas, the salary numbers are x-ed out…

Fact is that the work relationship was not continued at the end of the probationary period, as the former employee made the increase in work hours dependent on salary demands, which could not be fulfilled on the part of TI. Since her job interview, the employee was aware that the initially agreed upon number of hours of 20 hours per week was to be increased at the end of the probationary period. The initially arranged salary for 20 work hours per week was XXXX Euro per month without deductions. The employee demanded a salary of XXXX Euro per month without deductions for the increased time of 30 work hours per week. The yearly budget of a non-profit non-governmental organization like Transparency Germany (see http://www.transparency.de/Jahresabschluss\_2004.70.0.html) and the consideration of the salaries of other employees of the organization does not permit pay raises such as this.

Per communication of our legal advisor, the blogger was asked to remove the post due to the misrepresentations within, which actually happened in the meantime.

We abstained deliberately from a cease-and-desist letter in the communication and granted the blogger an opportunity to remove the text. No legal or financial ramifications arose for the blogger.

Transparency Germany has acknowledged the discussions in the blogs regarding this subject. We are of the opinion that weblogs should not be abused as platform for dissemination of misrepresentations._

Transparency Germany

Here is a small service for Moni on this usually unpolitical family page. My humble translation talents have to be good for something. If you don’t know this story, you can read about it here, here, here and here, also here.

A friend of mine, who has to take care of a three and a half year old son, has just been fired under totally unacceptable circumstances after her probationary period. She used to work at Transparency Germany, the German chapter of the non-governmental organization Transparency International, who pledged themselves against corruption in businesses. She worked there 20 hours a week for 1000 Euros gross, with a finished degree, several years of job experience etc. She only survived, because she also worked as a freelance journalist on top of that.

After the managing director told her that she was doing an excellent job, she asked my friend if she could increase from 20 to 30 hours after the probationary period. This of course meant that my friend would had to give up her freelance work and live only on their salary, so she made a salary demand, to receive 1400 Euros after deductions for 30 hours. If that was not possible, my friend offered to stay with the 20 hours and 1000 Euros without deductions. Next there was a board meeting and after that my friends manager informed her in brief that she would be let go at the end of her probationary period. Without an offer, without any negotiation, without any further talk even.

The manager told her about her successor, too: concerning a woman, who was applying for a different position and said right at the job interview that the low salary would not be a problem, her husband earned enough, and she did not really need the money. That’s how quick and easy things go. No solutions that everybody can live with are pursued, just a simple switch made. In a job market situation, in which so many are depending on the work and the money, they are hiring highly qualified people for a pittance and then swap them out, as soon as they find somebody, who does not even use the money, even if they were very satisfied with the work. My friend is now left there with her kid and her freelance work, which by itself is not securing her survival. Things like that seem to be “normal” nowadays? But truly not with an NGO, who fly the banner of morals and ethics and whose basic tenets include integrity. This is a real disappointment.

[Jan 29, 2006: More than two weeks ago, my friend wrote a letter to the board, which, to this day, has not received a reply.]

Snow!

A few weeks ago we finally got some snow in arid Arizona (no rain for 143 days). It snowed for two days and I was glad I had split some wood beforehand. The fire crackled in the stove round the clock. We dried the few wet logs on the stove and the smell of juniper pervaded all rooms.

This wealth of wintery joy had to be exploited immediately, as it would vanish in a few days time. The snow was too powdery for a snowman, but just right for snow angels and snowball fights.

After two days, everything was over. It melted overnight. All that remained was a few dirty snow patches in the shadow of the rocks and the memory of a winter day with the kids.